Back to blog
/// OUR INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE >>>

We Paid a Niche Influencer $1,500. Here's Exactly What Came Back.

· Owen

We paid Briar Cochran $1,500 for one video about our app. It brought 958 installs in 48 hours, revenue sat flat for seven days while the trials ran, and then the fee paid itself back almost 4x. Here are all the real numbers.

Cover image for We Paid a Niche Influencer $1,500. Here's Exactly What Came Back.

Most influencer marketing advice is vibes. People tell you to work with creators your audience trusts, but nobody shows you the invoice next to the revenue chart. So here's ours.

The deal

Briar Cochran is a short-form content strategist. He's built content strategy for names like Tony Robbins and Shelby Sapp, and 105,000 people follow him to learn how short-form works. When he talks about what makes a video convert, his audience listens, because that's his job.

He's also connected to us in a deeper way. We trained Artec's viral predictor by analyzing 60,000 videos from top creators, and Briar's content is part of what it learned from. So when we paid him $1,500 for one video, the premise wasn't ad copy. He told his audience he coded his brain into an app, and that's literally true.

He posted it on a Monday evening, January 13th. It worked so well that we booked a second video at the same rate later. This article is about the first one.

The next 24 hours

By the next day, 614 people had installed the app. A normal day in December was about 100. 53 of those people went on to become paying subscribers, which made it the biggest single day in the app's history. The first 48 hours brought 958 installs and 91 eventual payers.

Then came the part that would have scared us if we didn't know it was coming. Revenue didn't move. Our app runs a 7-day free trial, so for a full week after the biggest signup day we'd ever had, revenue sat flat around $400 a day.

Then the trials ran out. January 21st: $2,019. January 22nd: $2,097. Fifty-two transactions a day, when our norm was fifteen.

Install wall after Briar's post, flat revenue for seven days, then the trial conversion spike

So if you run trials and you judge an influencer post on week-one revenue, you're going to kill campaigns that are about to pay you.

The math

We track every cohort by the day they arrived and everything they've paid since.

  • The subscribers from the first 24 hours after Briar's post have paid $3,338 so far. That's 2.2x the fee, and that's the most conservative cut possible.
  • Widen it to the first 48 hours and it's $5,758, which is 3.8x.
  • And it keeps compounding, because RevenueCat's prediction model puts those first-48-hour subscribers at about $6,700 by the time their lifetime plays out. That's 4.5x the fee from one video.

The prediction data taught us something else: a subscriber cohort here ends up worth about twice its first-month revenue. So if you judge an influencer post at day 30, you're only seeing half of it.

One honest footnote: a month later we put a couple hundred dollars into Sparking the video. It did nothing. Every number above is from the organic window.

Why it worked: conversion, not reach

The video did about 105,000 organic views. That's not a big number. Josh, the UGC creator from our last article, did five times that. So per view, Briar was the most expensive content we've ever run.

It didn't matter, because his views converted like nothing we've seen:

  • 9.5% of installs became paying subscribers. His first 48 hours: 958 installs and 91 payers. The rest of January converted at 4.6%, so his traffic converted at double the rate on the same app with the same paywall. On the days his wave ran, it held between 9 and 11 percent.
  • About one paying subscriber per thousand views. Josh's viral video converted at less than half that rate per view.
  • 3,791 saves. Saves are founders bookmarking the app to come back to, and for conversion that's the best signal on the board.
  • A like rate over 5% on the real view count.

An influencer in your niche brings you an audience that already trusts him and already cares about your kind of product. You pay more per view and you get fewer views, but each one is worth a lot more.

The month it made

Zoom out to the calendar and January was the best month in the app's history:

  • 9,395 new users. Three times December.
  • 547 became paying subscribers. That's a 5.8% install-to-paid rate.
  • $24,012 in revenue. Our biggest month ever.

New app users per month, January at 9,395, three times the December baseline

Full credit where it's due: our UGC creator was running the same week, so January is the two of them together. But the shape of the month is clear. Put your product in the right creators' hands and the whole curve moves.

The playbook

  1. Pick influencers whose audience is your customer, not the biggest number you can afford. Expect to pay more per view, because you're buying conversion, not reach.
  2. Pay flat for one great, native video, and let them make it in their voice. Briar's premise was true, so it never felt like an ad.
  3. Know your trial length before you judge anything. Our money showed up on day 7.
  4. Track cohorts, not campaigns. You pay the fee once and the cohort pays you for months.

The same week this ran, we also had a UGC creator from our community go viral for us on a $2 CPM performance deal. We put the two head to head in the next article.

Ready to grow? Find creators and influencers in your niche, already trained and proven, at artec.app.

Related content